man, p____ rocked the shit last night.
so it doesnt matter how much p___ lied because b____ was there too -- all that bullshit about holding hearings before the iraq war and saying we wouldnt be greeted as liberators and how it would last a decade. b____ bears as much responsibility for the iraq war as anyone. i mean, he blocked scott r____ -- former weapons inspector for the un who was in iraq until c___ pulled them out so he could bomb the shit out of baghdad because he needed a distraction -- from testifying in the senate hearings leading up to the vote to use force.
but the main reason i think p___ won the debate is their (p___'s and b____'s) different ideas of their roles as vp.
b___ is deferential -- o___ this, o____that, i'd just support whatever he does.
p___, on the other hand, is the one running.
that reminds me, i think her disastrous interviews work out in her favor. i mean, she spends half her time talking about the liberal elite media and how they hate real working-class americans and then the same things is repeated on talk radio and then they turn on the tv and see everyone making fun of p___, isnt she getting her point across? and then she sets the bar so low for this debate, she can come in and make b___ look uncomfortable and defensive.
and why did b___ name-drop home d___?
and isn't it weird how b___ always calls o___ by only his first name?
that's some clarence t____/orrin h____ shit.
No comments:
Post a Comment